Bulova 1957 Sea Clipper

Submitted by commodus192 on
Manufacture Year
1957
Movement Jewels
17
Case Serial No.
214380
Case shape
Round
Case color
White
Case Manufacturer
Bulova
Gender
Mens
Watch Description

Greetings all - my first post here.  Attached is a pic of my Bulova - one of a few that I have.  I received this watch about 6 years ago in a box of junkers that I bought as I needed a stem from a Wyler.  I ended up having a love hate relationship with it, as it would often stop - so I would forget about it, and on and on and back and forth.  Then, one day, I gave it *one* more chance, and I've been wearing it ever since - never stops, even after my wife accidentally washed my pants with it in my pocket.  Regrettably, I can not seem to get into the case.  I've pushed on the crystal, gently attempted prying, and well, it runs well, so I just haven't wanted to mess with it any more than I have.  After spending lots and lots of time looking at old adverts and other pictures here, there - and everywhere, as well as relevant threads on this site and others, I've come to the idea that this particular Bulova is either a Sea Clipper, or Ocean Clipper.  I assume the movement type would likely give further evidence, but I am hopeful perhaps someone can chime in on which of the two it may be based on the picture.  I realize this watch looks like it's been kicked under the seat of a U-Haul truck the last 30 years, but - well, I just happen to really like it.   On the back case, it is waterproof, antimagnetic, self winding, shock resistant, stainless steel case.  There is no gold or yellow.  The numbers on the dial are raised - and the markers are distinctive.  The hands look to be luminescent in part.  There is a serial number on the outer back case as well, which I *think* is not relative to anything - unless what I've read about those numbers is incorrect.  It is number 214380. Any help/ideas - would be most greatly welcomed.  

Bulova watch
Bulova watch
Bulova watch
Bulova Watch
Reverend Rob
Posted March 6, 2014 - 3:07pm

I like this model. I strongly recommend getting it serviced, especially if it has gone through a wash cycle. Even small amounts of moisture can cause major problems. 

Case is a snapback? Otherwise the watch is front loading, and comes out after the bezel is removed, and would have a split stem. 

Mechanical watches should be serviced every 4-6 years, oils dry up, leaving residue behind which can act as an abrasive. Metal on metal, especailly in a humid environment, can cause serious damage. Even the ruby jewels can be abraded, leaving pink, highly abrasive dust. 

commodus192
Posted March 6, 2014 - 10:12pm

I will definitely get it serviced soon.  It appears the watch comes out the back, stem and all (doesn't need to be detached from the movement)  I've been told it is removed by pressing on the crystal and that it will make the caseback snap out.  I've tried, but - no go. Afraid my thumbs are going to go right through the crystal.  I'm sort of a sledgehammer watchmaker, so I guess I'll wait for a pro servicer to remove it, unless someone has some hints to impart on me.   

FifthAvenueRes…
Posted March 7, 2014 - 5:33am

The bezel housing the glass looks like it may detach from the Case, if so the Movement/Dial assembly will then 'flop out' from the front.  I'm not convinced of the dual identity in this instance:  The 'OCEAN CLIPPER' ad is 1957,  the subject Watch is also dated 1957. The 'SEA CLIPPER' ad Dates to 1959, the question is do We see the 'SEA CLIPPER' advertised prior?

William Smith
Posted March 9, 2014 - 3:52am

In reply to by FifthAvenueRes…

Good point Mark.  Checking for earlier Sea Clipper ads?  I  have not found any yet....

bourg01
Posted March 7, 2014 - 11:52am

WELCOME. I have one of these dated 1956. The entire works, crystal and case push out the bottom of the bezel. My experiences tell me yours is probably siezed due to dirt and perhaps even rust. I had o soak mine in liqued wrench and then heated the bezel at the lugs. The heat will expand the bezel slighly and you should be able to pop the seal and the case will come free.

Good luck with it.

commodus192
Posted March 7, 2014 - 12:55pm

I have not seen any Sea Clipper's dated prior to 59 - in fact, I've been looking at these ads long enough, that with the exception of my own, I'm getting quite good at the other Clippers lol.  I am going to try and get the movement out in the hopes that perhaps some secret lies in it's id.  Thank you for the suggestion in how to work it free; I will give this a try for certain - very helpful!

Geoff Baker
Posted March 14, 2014 - 6:10am

I've been watching the Sea and the Ocean from the fence on this one. I'm thinking "Ocean" based on the year.....

FifthAvenueRes…
Posted March 14, 2014 - 8:30am

Geoff,

I would have to agree.

tlk
Posted January 9, 2026 - 11:39pm

Howdy, Yall! I acrually have the same watch. It is an ocean clipper, I had mine restored a number of years ago. It was my Grandfathers (bought after serving in Korea) then passed to my father who wore it through Vietnam. Then given to me in pieces when I started college in 2007. Proud to say, I wore it the day I graduated. All that being said, I took to this site years ago for inisght and discovered it to be a 1957 Bulova Ocean Clipper. 11acac movement and 17 jewel. The part I am having trouble with is locating what the orginal band was, looked like and where to find one. A few of the ads give me an idea, but it's been hard to find an actual example. I do belive the Sea clipper and ocean clipper are relatively the same with minor differences. I have noticed that almost the Ocean clippers I have seen have extreme patina on the dial and weird oxidization.  

 

 

mybulova_admin
Posted January 10, 2026 - 12:50am

1957 Bulova Sea Clipper

1957 linebook shows what looks to be this watch as the Sea Clipper. 

In 1959 and 1960 linebooks it was labelled as Sea Clipper "AW".

The linebooks do not show any Ocean Clipper in the 'Clipper' series of watches that I can find.

We may need to re-evaluate this one.

Sea/Ocean I can see how they may have got the name wrong, or the 'handsome' bracelet is what makes it the Ocean Clipper. No linebook entries to confirm however.

Add new comment