It appears We have confused this previously unseen Model with the 'AMBASSADOR' of the same era in the database. * For database reference only: note the Lug and Crown variation.
In reply to The 1939/40 "AMBASSADOR..." by WatchCrystals.net
AMBASSADOR "A" vs. OXFORD, Circa 1939/40? (Or a lame redial, on the Ambie<or> OX?!)
OR PERHAPS NEITHER, SINCE THE SAME EXACT CASE IS SPORTING A '21J" 10AE!)
FRANKEN BULL? OR perhaps an UPSCALED "Lincoln," or "Montgomery" ???
I POSTED THIS AD SNIPPET/= BEFORE HERE, IN SEVERAL PLACES... (1939, SAT. EV. POST...)
:-) Scott
In reply to Ambassador "C" is my call by mybulova_admin
I can see a few details that are different between the watch we're discussing and the Ambassadors pictured. As a Bulova Noob, I don't know if they are important, but...
Compare the bottom picture from Scott's first post with the top picture in his second post.
1. The lugs of the Ambassadors pictured extend farther in, and are more curved than the subject watch.
2. The crown of the subject watch is recessed, whereas it is not on the Ambassadors.