It appears We have confused this previously unseen Model with the 'AMBASSADOR' of the same era in the database. * For database reference only: note the Lug and Crown variation.
SAY WHAT!?
Then perhaps I've mainly been snipin' OXFORDS? LOL... (However... This "C" dial, NEVER!)
And then we are to believe that this is a (17J?) "OXFORD," vs. one of the other two models, or the Illustrator wasn't "out to lunch" then, eh??? And ALSO that the model was SO popular... that they used a "C" style dial variant, reserved for very BEST sellers!?!
Got movement and caseback pics??? I'm wondering IF:
That dial was a "custom?" (Love that "C" dial style! Bet others did/do TOO!?)
The case was"reused" to house an Ambassador dial/movement?
The Ambassador case was modified in 1939 or 41?
It's rather one of the other two models I mentioned, that likely ALSO look very similar?
GOOD POINTS and OBSERVATIONS ALL, BTW...
:-) Scott
Since I am the quintessential "newbie" here it seem very obvious that this is indeed the Oxford and not Ambassador but regardless, it is one of the most beautiful watches I have had the pleasure of seeing. Super find and I am sure it is very highly prized by it's owner.