this is a photo of my new 666 , I think it is a keeper , I have only just started collecting watches and have about 17 of all sorts, and was very pleased to get this . ps sweet site it helped me heaps ! thanks to all . just have to find more now lol, Hi all Here is a updated 666, With a matching band ?? Image 4 - 5 New old stock , Looks much Better 07/12/12 - Onya's Pat
In reply to We have the Snorkel 666 as a by mybulova_admin
My question - to the panel. Is 'Snorkel / 666' a sub classification to "Oceanographer" or vice versa? I personally believe the former. I thinks there was, in the early 60's a watch called "Snorkel" but this is much later.
Either way it is a very nice example, glad you're onboard pato.
Hi DarHin
Thank you for making me aware of the Movement model ,( i have corrected it ) also i just removed the back for the first time , Very nice looks even better in the real , had a look and yes both r marked M9 so i am thinking this is a good thing ?? as i said i am new to this and have a few nice ones but this is the best so far!
Thankx Pato
In reply to Pato, if the date code on the by DarHin
Geoff,
"OCEANOGRPHER"
It seems the "SNORKEL" became a sub- specie of.
ad Dated 1970 http://www.mybulova.com/sites/default/files/vintage_ads/Bulova_AD_1970_…
In reply to Geoff, "OCEANOGRPHER" It by FifthAvenueRes…
Fifth
Based on that ad above, subject watch case is similar to "Ocenaographer" variant "M".
For this series, I think terms like "Snorkel" are names given to subset of variant letters of Oceanographers. The "M" variant is unique to the ad you link above. Snorkel is used for several variants in the series, but not all variants.
Snorkel term is a subset of Oceanographer's. Variant "M" is both a subset of "Snorkel" and subset of "Oceanographer".
Now what do we do? As long as we are consistant across the board, and use some ad-based reasoning, we are good until more ads/info surface.