Post your new Bulova watch ads from 1920-1929 here.
IMPORTANT: When adding adverts please try and also include the models referenced. This helps when searching the site.
I think this matches this unknown:
https://www.mybulova.com/watches/1928-unknown-10649#comment-76626
Unfortunately still no name for it.
April 18, 1928 Chicago Trubune
In reply to The American Guardian Dec 7, by JimDon5822
First time I've seen this adervt which contains a telegram asking the jeweler to return any old watch movements, working or not to be used to train ex-servicemen.
Shows that Bulova were even involved with helping ex-servicemen prior to WWII.
Advert dates to 6 May 1925.
In reply to 1925 Jewelry Store catalog… by neetstuf-4-u
In reply to Jul-08-1927-Ames-Daily… by plainsmen
In reply to I don't know that this is… by plainsmen
In reply to Well Baker... I don't know… by plainsmen
In reply to The Kansas City Star Kansas… by TexasLady
In reply to (No subject) by TexasLady
In reply to WOAH.. check out the lugs on… by plainsmen
We have one in the database here with the same corner design: https://mybulova.com/watches/1925-unknown-2122
I've seen this case shape and corner design on other brands.
Note the lack of BULOVA on the dial.
I'd say they used one of their generic print blocks for this case design rather than an official Bulova supplied one.
Pretty call all the same.
In reply to We have one in the database… by mybulova_admin
In reply to We have one in the database… by mybulova_admin
That unknown sure looks like an exact match to the Lone Eagle ad to me with the exception of the price being more in line with a gold filled watch. But it brings up a good question. We know Bulova ordered cases from case manufacturers that sold to other brands. We see this all the time. I wonder if the case order was sent to Bulova with the wrong engraving and they just used what they received and someone printed an ad based on this. It might explain some of the engraving and enameling variations we see in some of the watches especially in the early days.
In reply to That unknown sure looks like… by JimDon5822