The above comments are a few of the reasons that I gave only two ticks for a "tentative" ID for this watch as Ramona. I vote the same "tentative" on several others watches which IMO are id'ed at the "tentative" level. When theres some evidence that it may be such and such a model, but no exact ad match, that is often "tentative" IMO. One could argue subject watch is one-tick "not confirmed" if there were no close ad match, but there is an ad which is close, so I voted a tentative ID.
It looks like four panel members have voted on the ID as Ramona.
It also looks like I'm the only one who voted two ticks for" tentative", and the other three panel members give three ticks for "confirmed".
While each panel member can assign one, two or three ticks for ID, the overall "tick score" displays an average of all votes.
Example:
If four panel members voted on this watch, and two of the panel gave one tick (not confirmed), and the other two gave three ticks (confirmed), the display would average these scores and display an overall "two ticks tentative" ID score.
I usually give three ticks to an ID only when there is good evidence to warrant "Confirmed" (matching ad within a few years of production date).
If a panel member does not agree with the ID as published, a one tick vote of "not confirmed" would be the "vote" which indicates their disagreement. If a panel member does not agree with ID and does not vote, there is no indication of their disagreement in the displayed ticks.