William Smith
Posted December 30, 2014 - 9:07pm
In reply to To get my point across, I by 1955mercury
I agree both your example and subject watch are non-conforming compared to the ads at hand. I seriously doubt the Garfield case housing a 15 jewel movement is another model name....so it's a marriage or movement swap, with a non-advertised dial.
I'm at least changing my ticks to one (not-confirmed) based on all this...and to your point, I doubt it will ever be confirmed because it's polygamous marriage... LOL (Garfield case, 15 j movement, and what is probably an after Point Of Sale dress dial).