Add new comment

mybulova_admin
Posted June 20, 2015 - 11:24pm

In reply to by Alex

It may also mean that they were getting rid of 1924/25 stock movements in 1926 cases. The only idea I can come up with why they continued to use this type of case coding is that one of their factories was still using old tooling machines which had not been updated to the new coding standard. It's impossible to say when these coding standards changed, but at least we are seeing some of these patterns emerge.