bobbee
Posted February 11, 2013 - 5:59pm
I leave that to the panel, but in my opinion it's an LE.
Why, with two ads separated by 15 months, are we questioning the validity of an ID?
Just because it is a "precious" Lone Eagle? If it was "just" a Senator, we wouldn't have any trouble believing it. Oh yeah, we already did that for the 1928 Senator, didn't we, on very, very little information!
To the Bulova Watch Company, it was their biggest moneyspinner, and the more the merrier. Just look how many Lone Eagles there are in the watch DB, from all the years of their production, and then think "why are there none from 1933?"