P.S. And hereafter is the (low res.) ad illustration... which may in fact read: "Academy Award "N," or perhaps we are merely reading that into the equation? OR... it could even be a "typo?"
Hopefully someone online has more ads, to help clarify whether on not these "X" dials are (or are not) worthy of the title namesake? I suspect now that they are more likely NOT? However we still need definative PROOF to as much? The corrogated golden & silver curtain is obvious enough... However what do the 1951+ ads READ... And how was the lawsuit (settlement, regarding as much) WORDED?? Any lawyers out there collecting Vintage Bulovas, or up to it???
See also: http://www.mybulova.com/watches/1950-Academy-Award-128
http://openjurist.org/223/f2d/478/schnur-cohan-v-academy-of-motion-pict…;
And: http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/223/223.F2d.478.6128.html
:-) Scott
