Add new comment

of  course i know bulova probably use other mfg case for his assembly, but did the other collector can confirm this case was use by bulova? if not , only a dial cant make it a bulova. The probleme is we have to prove that case was used by bulova cause as we know in 1918 bulova already use his own case (american standard) and in 1915 too by your american maid..... and 1916 we see rubaiyat trench watch case...... why using a unknown case name with maxim hudson dial. and moreover like as i say in the last comment on page 2, the RACINE movement is from enicar who as put the lady racine serie and enicar serie till 1914 on market.... but the most important thing is  if we date and id by the case..... where is the proof that case is a or used by bulova ? whitout this proof ..... once again.... only a dial cant make it a bulova for sure..... missing info on the case. can we link it to bulova by a way or another ? so if we go this way, a ton of old watch can be a bulova..... just like one i found with a star watch case or wadswort case with movement from cattin-aubry or A. RACINE (before 1918) can all be from bulova..... do we will accept to id these watch as a bulova ? for the gerber case company we need a solid link. cause other way you will have to accept these(wadsworth and star watch) watch too. as i told in my long comment on page 2. no reference for gerber case but look at this picture from here what we can see at the bottom is the swc co and wadsworth case co. i have a link for this too and do we accept to put in the data base ? sadly no! so why do we accept the subject watch? for the dial? as i told, im in search of consistency fir this hm./sites/default/files/uploaded_photos/user24327/Screenshot_20240908_102328_com.android.chrome.jpg

this is a link to prove star watch case and wadsworth case was use in 1915 and before...... and we dont put it on site ? but this hm can sit in d.b.? really hard too understand.