mybulova_admin
Posted October 27, 2021 - 5:21am
Agreed. The Banker case is different: See this 1939 example which might explain the movement.
The case is more aligned with a 1935/36 Bulova Lone Eagle (non-engraved version), as per the case serial number starting with a 6.
The Lone Eagle also housed a 17 jewelled movement, so that further implies that the movement in not origial to the case.
I think there are too many differences here to justify a Lone Eaghle ID.