Looks & feels good on the wrist-Excellent Timekeeper.
This watch is not a Beacon!
Im very new to this stuff, but I found a 1941 alden that looks the same except its not black... Ill keep looking.
In reply to Im very new to this stuff, by c.roden31
Ok, im way off. Sorry
In reply to Ok, im way off. Sorry by c.roden31
Haha.... welcome to the club bro. But hey... 60% of the time I'm right every time!
In reply to Haha.... welcome to the club by plainsmen
Jerin,
You should be? Afterall... you have a Beacon and the ad, therefore!? I'm only correct 99% of the time, myself. (Wink...)
:-) Scott
Wayne,
Not a Beacon?
Same Case, 17J. Only a slight variation with the dial/hands if You look closely.
In reply to Wayne, Not a Beacon? Same by FifthAvenueRes…
Lugs look very different to me. The lugs on the watch are raised on the case and have a sweeping dip to them, the one in the advert are smooth and rounded
The cases are the same Gents. Hands are not correct on black dialed watch, but that don't make it a Non-Beacon.
.jpg)
.jpg)
Wayne, I think the point 5th was making is that trhe cases are very different. Not the hands.
I tend to agree, the case on yours has curved ends, the Beacon in the ad above does not.
If there are other watches on this site that have the curved ends and are ID'd as a Beacon, I'd say that they have been mis-identified.
Thoughts?
In reply to Wayne, I think the point 5th by mybulova_admin
Admin,
Beacon is not on the search drop-down list, but it is on add a watch.
Stop confusing us with FACTS Mr.!