No markings on back or when back is open according to jeweler. Watch is being repaired now so only one photo available. The selected year is a guess since it’s unknown and it’s a mandatory field
In reply to I'd like to see more photos… by mybulova_admin
The first time I saw this watch I thought I had seen it before. Found this ad in a 1945 Montgomery Ward catalog so I do believe it to be a factory model. We have one like this already in the database as a Commentator.https://mybulova.com/watches/1942-commentator-8804
Well that's nailed it, just looks like we need to update the year. There should be some date information on the case. A clear photo posted here would confirm.
194? Bulova Commentator looks to be the direction we are heading if we can confirm the 21J movement and case date.
A solid gold case would also explain the lack of obvious back case stamping.

In reply to I am good with Commentator… by Kathy L.
What’s “non-conforming“ mean? Non-conforming to what?
It’s being repaired now, initial opening of case did not reveal any markings or identification. Jeweler will disassemble watch and look for any identification markings. I’ll provide update once I receive more information.
In reply to What’s “non-conforming“ mean… by savich13
Non-conforming is what we use when IDing a watch that either contains non-original parts like the movement, dial or case OR contains Bulova parts that don't correctly align with the model. In other words, we would never be able to accurately give the watch an ID, as Bulova never produced it as presented. Also, if the date of the parts used are years apart.
If the case on your watch is not stamped anywhere with BULOVA, chances are it's either an aftermarket case or a case from another manufacture that Bulova did not use.
At first glance it looks your watch might be all correct, but in order for it to be so, the case should have some stamping tying it back to either Bulova or one of the case companies they used.
It being a solid gold case could suggest it was made by another company for Bulova. It should still be stamped in some way.
I'm leaning towards it being a Bulova Commentator, year to be confirmed.