In reply to Case is a later 1927/28 by mybulova_admin
I trust ya here, however w/o some other pictures, pat. date etc... or a brief summary of the difference, it's not obvious to me. Is it just the recasing evedence which looks different? The 6's and 8's are hard to distinguish for those who don't look as long, hard, and close as we do.
case serial number as entered suggests 1928, although not evidenced by picture. We have no way of knowing if it's a mis-stamped 6. Open nine dial and hands suggest earlier than 1928. No patent date info. 17 jewel movement from picture. I can't confirm if this is a Conqueror or a Lone Eagle.
camerondarcy PM'ed me a couple days ago saying they would double check the case SN and update teh record accordingly. I see it's been updated, so the confirmed case SN suggests this is a 1928 Lone Eagle (which just happens to have a 1926 10AN movement with a seral number falling w/i the range of the first 5000). I've changed from 1927 to 1928.