Fully restored Trojan in very nice condition.
Added 12/11/2011
Photos Updated 11/13/2013
Didn't the Conqueror 10A have 17 jewels?
In reply to Didn't the Conqueror 10A have by stoddrob
Good question. I gotta look at examples of watches and the ads we have..... I don't remember offhand....and it wouldn't impact my ID of Conqueror for this example... I don't think we have anything saying it would be something else based on the jewel difference...if it's even in the ads or other comparable watch records.
Geoff, were they the original hands?
Turned out fantastic!
Here's the 'before' pic Stephen - they are the hands that came with it.
Now - after having spent some quality time this morning with this watch, I have an apology. The case serial was misidentified - it IS 6518270 - my bad reading the partial '6' as an '8'. The open 9 on the dial got me to thinking it had to be a 1926, it is. Yes, it is 15J
SO - back to Trojan are we? I think so.....I have updated the dates, I cannot change the name.
If the case and movement indicate 1926 then a Trojan it is. Any chance of a photo if the back inside case.
In reply to If the case and movement by mybulova_admin
Case back as requested.........
Is there a watchmaker on EARTH whose codes do NOT appear here? If so, please step forward.
I say 1926 Trojan now. Moved to id review for name/date review/change.
'TROJAN'
'
ad Dated 1926