Roman numerals on movement case VIIII VI IIII
I would say 1926 Conqueror by case serial number
+1.
Case serial incorrect in root record, should be a '6' next to last, not a '5'.
Nice watch, all original.
Nice 1926 Conqueror w/ 1925 10P movement. Earlier 1924 patent date for dust-tite cover. Open 9 on dial.
Good catch on the second second-to-last case SN being 6 vs a 5. Great to have those Roman numerals match last three digits of case SN.
Fixed the 6 in the root. This one is pretty, going to get on it asap. I Sold my last one going to keep this guy!
In reply to Fixed the 6 in the root. This by zappatore88
Yep this one should be a keeper for sure.....appears all original :)
Glad to hear you are keeping it.
Has as much a chance as any other 1926 model in this style case of being a Lone Eagle too, you should keep that in mind. Not trying to be inflammatory, just stating a fact.
In reply to Glad to hear you are keeping by bobbee
Whatever it may be !
Gee Anthony, how many Conqueror / Lone Eagles do you have? This one is beautiful, congratulations!
Conqueror. Based on case s/n it should be 1926
In reply to Gee Anthony, how many by Geoff Baker
Not too many, I think my hunt is over.
Anyone have a stem for this 10p movement they want to sell me?