Agreed "F" from me. If the engraved version case/dial combo isn't represented in the ads as possibly being another variant if it's on a different mount (like leather) does the current mount make a difference in ID'ing? I thought the way we were handling the variant designations was to confirm regardless of mount if we only show it on one mount in the ads. If this same case/dial were seen in ads as a different variant, then we could not determine variant w/o regards to mount, but I don't think it can be anything else. It took quite a bit of "persuasion" to get me to give in on not matching the ads, but it made sense in instances where mount doesn't change model/variant. Am I missing something here?
I'm totally cool with two ticks since it's not on the mount, but am trying to be consistent.
I would have given three ticks for "F", but am now researching further.