L3 date code on the case
SN 6566934
21j 8AC movement
L1 date code
movement has apparently been replaced
I don’t know if this is a Douglas or a Brigadier. The information is not distinguishable between the two. As far as I can tell, it could be either. The line book from 56/57 shows the Brigadier “A” which is an exact match. The only Douglas variant shown in the ads is the Douglas “B” but I think that’s the rose gold version. Several examples of the yellow version are in the ads without variant identification. The gray dial Douglas and black dial Brigadier most be other variants as well but they’re not identified as such.
All that I ask is that when each of you decide which model it is, please explain why it’s that model and not the other.
I received this with a bracelet that wasn’t original so I took the pictures with a strap on it.
I am going to go with the theory in this thread and go with Brigadier. https://www.mybulova.com/watches/1951-brigadier-6601
1953 Bulova Brigadier
I do not disagree. However, there are 10 models ID’d as a Douglas plus a Douglas “B” all dated 1948 and later. There are also 2 Brigadier’s dated 1945. Additionally, the 1949 ad in bobbee’s comment from the ‘51 Brigadier shows an Ambassador with a basket weave bracelet that’s identical to the 1948 Douglas which also makes it identical to the Brigadier. If the bracelet is the distinguishing factor, my watch can be either since it doesn’t have either of the original bracelets and, currently, no bracelet at all. So, if this is not a Douglas because it’s after 1947, why isn’t it the Ambassador?
In reply to I do not disagree. However,… by Stinky_Sullivan
In reply to In looking on Newspapers the… by Kathy L.