Bulova 1947 American Girl

Submitted by nicoroc on
Manufacture Year
1947
Movement Model
5AO
Movement Jewels
17
Movement Serial No.
-
Case Serial No.
-
Case shape
Square
Case color
White
Gender
Ladies
Watch Description

wound and ran over night keeping time. more pics to come, excellent condition. for sale

Bulova watch
Bulova watch
Bulova watch
Bulova Watch
Bulova Watch
bourg01
Posted April 9, 2013 - 6:38pm

The caseback date should put it in the early 50's. I can say with certainty, There was no American Girl in the 40's or at least I've never seen one earlier than the 50's. I think this one will be from 1952-53 but I wouldn't commit to that notion 100%.

William Smith
Posted April 9, 2013 - 6:49pm

PM sent requesting update on a case date code symbol.  

William Smith
Posted April 15, 2013 - 2:38pm

I'm good w/ American Girl, but I don't think this model was advertised until the 1950's.  Any suggestions on a date for this watch?  It couldn't have been an American Girl in 1947.

William Smith
Posted April 15, 2013 - 8:47pm

Should we update year to our "guess" of 1952?  Sounds like 1947 isn't possible w/ this model series.

bourg01
Posted April 15, 2013 - 9:38pm

Nope, 1947 isn't a possibility but I don't think we can assingn a date without confirmation of the case date stamp. The watch is an American Girl with a movement swap. That's about as far as we should go with it.

OldTicker
Posted April 15, 2013 - 10:11pm

I would agree, Non-Conforming American Girl, wrong movement, wrong era...

mybulova_admin
Posted April 16, 2013 - 7:44am

Wrong movement doesn't make it non-conforming neccesatily, it just makes it an American Girl with the wrong movement.

If you put a 10AE in a Conqueror or Lone Eagle, it would still be a Conqueror or Lone Eagle, just with the wrong movement.

William Smith
Posted April 17, 2013 - 2:46pm

Sounds like we have a non-American Girl dial now too.  Incorrect movement and incorrect dial, along with no solid year of case production (which we would need to use if ID'ed as American Girl- since we are basically ID'ing the case in this instance).  

I think it's either Non-Conforming, or a record which can be deleted (or ignored) since we don't even know the date.