This is an interesting one. It clearly seems to be a Walton case but don't recall seeing a Walton prior to 1948 or one that was 14KT gold plate. The fact that it is a Sterling base and serial number begins with a 4 indicates the 1944 date is probably accurate. The movement is a 10AK 15J movement but with an A9 date code. I did find an 1949 ad for a 17J version of this case called a Gladiator and a 1949 Ad indicating a 15J Walton. Everything appears to be original with the exception of the crystal. it has a huge domed crystal. This one has me stumped. Is it a 1949 Bulova Walton 15j version or a frankenwatch?
In reply to What are the dates and… by Geoff Baker
I don't know what to make of this one either. Ads for Walton and Gladiator appear to be the same graphics, and it appears that neither match the face on subject watch based on number shapes, particularly the "5" and "7". This could just be artist rendition, I suppose. It's definitely all Bulova. I'm on the fence. Earliest date is the case being 1944, which is earlier that any documented Waltons in the Db, and face doesn't match. Then again, all documented Waltons have a hooked leg "7" and date 1948 to 1952.
If the Gladiator ad is a stand alone, it may be a misprint.
This could be a 1944 Walton with a replaced motor, or it may also be an unknown Pre-Walton w/replaced motor. It may even be a 1944 unknown with a replaced motor and face, making it a marriage. I personally don't have enough info to make a call as of yet.
Unknown for me for now.
In reply to Certainly a lot in play. I'm… by Geoff Baker
My thoughts:
1. I am not aware of any A9 10AK movements dating from 1949. This in itself is unusual. Was the bridge replaced? Anyone seen one this late before?
2. 1949 movement along with 1944 case.
3. Dial font. It does not match the Walton. The best match is a 1949 Director to this dial.
My own self conclusion is this must be a marriage watch. A 1944 case, with a replaced 1949 movement and 1949 Director dial or movement with replaced bridge.
