In reply to (No subject) by mustang6nine
There should be numbers on the back of the case, along with language that verifies the case as belonging to Bulova. How about showing us some pics of the inside and outside of the case back?
Ummm. . . larger pics. :)
Okay, I can see the back now, though it's a pretty distorted view. Nothing at all on the back?
How about the inside of the case back?
In reply to 17 jewels , 8AH by mustang6nine
In reply to Looks very much like a by GVP
In reply to Both movements are ETA by vintagebulova.com
This entire post has "happened" in less that 24 hours. Lets give Mustang6nine some time to read our requests and take some photos. The inside case back pictures will help for sure. 6nine may not realize how quickly things can happen on site. Having said that...now where's those darned pictures.....just kidding :)
In reply to This entire post has by William Smith
He responded within minutes to all our other questions. When it was clear that we weren't going to give up on the question regarding the inside of the case and the absence of a Bulova case signature, he signed off and hasn't returned.
I welcome his return and posting of the requested picture and information, but I sure wouldn't put any money on it happening.
Yeh, a picture! Thank you.
Unfortunately, I can't read what it is printed on the inside of the case, but it certainly does not appear to be a Bulova signature.
I have to agree with OT on this one, although it's a good looking watch, it's not all Bulova. It has only a Bulova movement, which appears to date to 1945. The case is 1950s in styling and not Bulova-made.