I do enjoy a good challenge. WWI era 1914–1918 'RUBAIYAT'. the production date of 1916 is an estimate only.
We've seen the 2 on the inside caseback of a 'RUBAIYAT' before so it isn't a case serial number imo.
I vote that you go full-hog with a full no expense spared restoration...you owe it to the watch :-)
In reply to I vote that you go full-hog… by mybulova_admin
I agree Stephen. The case is missing the lower lug, the tube is there. I'm going to send it out.. Balance is fubar with a hairspring all over the place and a broken staff - the main problem. The dial is very nice, the Hour hand was inside the bezel. I'm missing a seconds hand.
Truly amazing! Congrats on a great find.
One more added thought to this thread: The vintage newspaper ad published by the Los Angeles Times in 1918 states that watches offered by the Geo. D. Davidson Co are from the J. Bulova Co of Bienne, Switzerland. There is no mention of New York, U.S.A.
In reply to One more added thought to… by FifthAvenueRes…
Could this be an example of the first Gents wrist watch introduced to the United States mentioned in the Bulova History timeline?
maybe
In reply to Could this be an example of… by FifthAvenueRes…
I would put money on it, which is why it belongs in the museum or my personal collection once you've fully restored it :-)
I'm hoping you can find a donor movement for the hairspring.
In reply to I would put money on it,… by mybulova_admin
perhaps mart1n888 would be willing to donate His 'RUBAIYAT' for a good cause ......
In reply to perhaps mart1n888 would be… by FifthAvenueRes…
if you talk about this one, i will keep it in my collection as far as she run pretty well.... its my little treasure i cant make a donation 😂
The year is still the question. Did you say the advert is dated 1918?
We know Bulova first started 'using' Rubaiyat in 1916 and trademarked as early as May 15, 1917. I do often wonder what if any the difference between 'Rubaiyat W Co' and just 'Rubaiyat' is?